RSS

Category Archives: Sense and Sensibility

Sense and Sensibility Review

Sense and Sensibility

Published: 1811
Pages: ~205
Completed: Yes
Enjoyed: Yes

Seriousness: Fairly light-hearted, but with serious issues behind the plot
Genre: Romance
Difficulty: Slightly archaic, some awkward sentences
Rating: PG

Recommend: Yes

Up next … I have no specific plan at this point. There will be more, but I’m not going to try to put a line around it.

Advertisements
 
Leave a comment

Posted by on March 11, 2013 in Review, Sense and Sensibility

 

Deus Ex Machinations

It’s rather amusing that sometimes a character’s attempts to manipulate things to their own advantage actually benefits their nominal opponent. In the case of Sense and Sensibility, I experienced the following sequence of reactions:

  • “Welp, Lucy’s married. Oooh, poor Elinor.”
  • “Hmmm… the details are suspiciously vague – is this more of her teenage-girl-eque cattiness?”
  • “Wait, Robert?!? Where did that come from?!”
  • “Oh, right, yay!”

So, once relevant explanations are made, it all makes perfect sense; and indeed, it never felt like something completely out-of-the-blue, just unexpected. In some ways, an even more difficult twist to pull off than the one that leaves the audience thinking “Of course! Why didn’t I see it before?”. It’s got to be something that doesn’t explain itself, but feels plausible enough that the audience will be expecting it to be explained in the not-too-distant future (and it better not be too distant, lest you lose audience good-will).

So everything works out happily in the end. I’m just annoyed that Marianne is frequently referred to as being a “reward” for Colonel Brandon’s friendship and help. A product of the time, I suspect, but it comes across just a mite creepy these days.

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on March 11, 2013 in Sense and Sensibility

 

You have my sympathies. Or not.

A common concept in fiction is crafting sympathetic or likeable characters – those whom the reader can relate to. It’s far more important for the protagonist than the antagonist, though can make for a very interesting tale when the reader can appreciate both sides of the argument.

Unfortunately, it often happens that a character – intended by the author to be sympathetic – does not come across as well to the reader. This may be through personal experience, cultural difference, or just a poorly written character. It’s a probable outcome of someone writing directly from life; they know the person, so feel for them already, but have not provided enough to engage the reader.

This can even happen to as good an author as Jane Austen.

We’re nearing the end of Sense and Sensibility. I’ve been amusing Rose Red along the way with random predictions of what’s going to happen, why so-and-so has done that, and which characters will be fighting a duel in a later chapter (all of which I got completely wrong, of course). Willoughby has been proven a cad, and we’ve just had the opportunity to hear his side of the story.

If you believe Elinor’s reaction to his tale, he’s a poor unfortunate soul, who has now wound up married to a woman he doesn’t even like, while hopelessly in love with Marianne. All his problems are apparently a result becoming independently wealthy too early in life.

The poor thing. Regardless of the reasons that led him astray, there’s still the fact that he’s wasted an awful lot of money; continued to do so after realising he’s living beyond his means; abandoned one young lady, after getting her pregnant no less (still considered dastardly behaviour now, let alone in that era); led along another young lady to gratify his own ego (before actually falling for her – oh noes, poor him!); then married yet another young lady purely for her money (and goodness knows what on earth she sees in him – she doesn’t seem to be getting anything out of the arrangement).

I appreciate him recognising and owning up to his flaws and misconduct, but still consider him the closest thing to a villain of the piece. Maybe I’m becoming curmudgeonly in my old age, but – while I can forgive the ignorance behind his early profligacy – I find it harder to sympathise with someone suffering the consequences of choices they knowingly made.

But maybe the point is just that we should consider him pitiful rather than malicious. Hanlon’s Razor and all that. Though personally, I prefer Blore’s.

 
2 Comments

Posted by on March 3, 2013 in Sense and Sensibility